Monday, March 11, 2013

Kwame Kilpatrick Convicted in Federal trial

This is not exactly news which ought to surprise anyone but former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick was convicted of 24 counts of racketeering and extortion and other crimes.  He could face 20 years in prison. I'm not jubilant nor am I sad. It's just really disappointing because he was someone who could have done a lot of good for the city of Detroit and maybe even the state of Michigan. Unfortunately, in my opinion, he got caught up in the trappings of power and more interested in how he could enrich his friends, family and business partners than how best to serve the citizens of Detroit. Coming on the heels of a soon to be announced emergency financial manager for the city of Detroit, this conviction doesn't bode well for those who argue that the city can get out of the horrible political and financial situation it finds itself facing.

Kilpatrick's hardly the only black politician to get taken down by the feds and he won't be the last. You would think that corrupt black mayors, representatives, and senators would learn that unlike NY banks and financial institutions, the Justice Department and federal prosecutors, do not in fact, consider them to be too big to jail.


So if you know that the police are constantly following you as you drive down the expressway, even though that might be unfair and irritating, do you obey the speed limit or do you step on the gas, speed up to 90 mph and start weaving in and out of traffic? I know what my answer is. And I know what Kilpatrick's answer is too..

But some people always have to learn things the hard way. A hard head indeed makes for a soft behind.

Former Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and his longtime friend Bobby Ferguson have just been convicted of racketeering and extortion, marking an end to a more than decade-long public corruption investigation. The three faced a combined 45 charges accusing them of racketeering, extortion, bribery and mail fraud, among other things. Kilpatrick was convicted on 24 of 30 counts, including five counts of extortion, racketeering, bribery and several mail, wire and tax fraud charges. On three counts he was found not guilty and on three there was no verdict reached.

Ferguson was found guilty on nine of 11 counts, including racketeering and several counts of extortion. He was found not guilty on one count and there was no verdict on another. Bernard Kilpatrick was convicted on one of four counts. He was convicted on a tax charge. There was no verdict for Bernard Kilpatrick on the racketeering charge and he was found not guilty on two other charges – attempted extortion and a tax charge.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

HBO Game of Thrones: Targaryen and Martell and Arryn

As we countdown to Season 3 of HBO's Game of Thrones I thought it might be fun each Sunday to share some quick reminders/background info on which ruling Houses are involved in war, what power they have or had and how they relate to one another. Obviously I intend to do this without spoiler information and hope that any reader who's familiar with the books will honor that as well. Otherwise I'll just have to cut off their heads. Personally. Because the man that passes the sentence should swing the sword. =) Hopefully, if you watch the show once the new season starts and all the names start to fly back and forth, this might help you recall who's who.

House Targaryen
House Targaryen originated in the East when it was part of the Valyrian Empire. Valyrians had access to greater technology and magic than the people of Westeros. They had dragons and though they did not conquer Westeros, they ruled almost the entire eastern continent. Eventually there was a cataclysm known as the "Doom of Valyria". The peninsula of Valyria sank into the sea. Many dragons were lost and the various eastern subject peoples rebelled/declared their independence. However there were both Valyrians and dragons that had survived. House Targaryen had established itself on the island of Dragonstone before the Doom. Roughly a century or so after the Doom, the Targaryen leader, Aegon Targaryen and his sister-wives decided to conquer Westeros. They only had a small army. But they had dragons. Aegon and his two sisters were skilled dragon riders and warriors, as you may remember from Season Two's discussion between Tywin Lannister and Arya Stark. Aegon's dragon Balerion was known as the Black Dread and was said to be so large that entire towns were in complete shadow under his wings when he flew. Some Targaryens had some immunity to heat or fire.
With one exception, Aegon and his sisters destroyed or subdued any king who refused to recognize Targaryen overlordship. The Targaryens eventually gave up their foreign gods and accepted the faith of the Seven. Their dragons shrunk and eventually died out. The Targaryens kept the practice of polygamy and royal incest. Brothers married sisters, aunts married nephews, and uncles married nieces. This was a religious and cultural abomination to most Westerosi but the Targaryens rarely concerned themselves with the opinions of lesser people. However this non-forking family tree caught up with House Targaryen as more kings showed signs of instability. Three centuries after the Targaryens crowned themselves as rulers, their mental frailty reached its nadir under Aerys the Mad, a rapist and tyrant, who murdered Eddard Stark's father, brother and several other men when they challenged him to account for his son Rhaegar Targaryen, who had kidnapped Lyanna Stark. The realm erupted in revolt. The war ended with Jaime Lannister murdering the Mad King, Robert Baratheon killing Rhaegar Targaryen and taking the throne for himself, and the Lannisters murdering Targaryen women and children to forestall any future succession threats.

There is one Targaryen still left alive. She has dragons, though little else.
Daenerys Targaryen believes herself to be the rightful ruler of all Westeros, though she has never seen it. She was conceived in the rebellion's final month and has been on the run ever since. Dragons are the nuclear weapons of Westeros warfare. Few people would dare to oppose anyone who controls full grown dragons. The Targaryen words are "Fire and Blood" which is exactly what they have traditionally given anyone unwise enough to challenge them. Time will tell if Daenerys has inherited her ancestors' cruelty and majesty or their unsteadiness (her parents were siblings after all)





House Martell
One House resisted the Targaryen conquest. It wasn't the proud Starks or the wealthy Lannisters. It was the Martells, the rulers of Dorne, Westeros' southernmost region. Dorne is culturally and ethnically dissimilar to the rest of Westeros. They do things differently in Dorne. Dorne practices equal inheritance regardless of gender and has a strong tradition of female warriors and leaders. This is likely because House Martell was raised to ruling prominence by the invading Queen Nymeria, a Rhoynish warrior leader who was fleeing Valyrian expansion. She took a Martell King as her husband. Together they conquered Dorne.

When the Targaryens invaded, House Martell avoided open battle where the dragons could be successful but led a long guerrilla struggle that eventually forced the Targaryens to withdraw. The Targaryens invaded again and failed. Finally, the Targaryens smartened up and arranged marriages between themselves and the Martells. Dorne joined the realm peacefully. House Martell became a reliable supporter of the Targaryen dynasty.


Dornish people can range widely in skin tone. Martin has described Dornish as having skin shades similar to paler northerly folks or being "tanned","olive skinned" or "brown skinned". Dorne seemingly shares some features with Moorish Spain, Wales, North Africa, Italy or Palestine. It will be interesting to see how HBO, which has been willing to cast people of color, will cast Dornish actors. I think people like Ioan Gruffudd, Antonio Banderas, Maria Grazia Cucinotta, Thandie Newton, Jean Reno, Freida Pinto, Naveen Andrews, and Wentworth Miller could all conceivably be a Dornish type. 

Elia Martell was the wife of Targaryen heir, Rhaegar Targaryen. During the sack of King's Landing it was Lannister bannermen, primarily The Mountain, who raped and murdered Elia Martell and her babies. House Martell has a well deserved reputation for neither forgiving nor forgetting. Elia Martell was the sister of Dorne's ruler, Prince Doran and his hotheaded younger brother Prince Oberyn. These past Lannister atrocities are why Cersei Lannister was opposed to Tyrion sending her daughter Myrcella to Dorne for betrothal and safekeeping. Dorne has ancient rivalries with The Stormlands (Baratheon) and The Reach (Tyrell). The regions have warred and raided for generations. Dorne is physically isolated behind mountain ranges and has more trade with the east than with the rest of Westeros.

The Martell sigil is a spear joined with the Sun. The Sun was the sigil of Nymeria and the Rhoynar while the spear was the sigil of the pre-Nymeria Martells. The Martell words are "Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken" which refers to the fact they joined the kingdom because they wanted to, not because Targaryens made them. As far as House Martell is concerned, no one can make them do anything.






House Arryn
Like House Martell , House Arryn rules over an isolated portion of Westeros, The Vale. The Vale is a peninsula surrounded on three sides by water and on the fourth by mountains.

Before the events in A Game of Thrones House Arryn was ruled over by Jon Arryn, an older Lord who had fostered Ned Stark and Robert Baratheon as youngsters. When the Mad King killed Ned Stark's relatives and friends (including one of Jon Arryn's nephews), he ordered Jon Arryn to send him the heads of Ned Stark and Robert Baratheon. Arryn refused and called his banners. The realm erupted in revolt with Houses Stark, Tully, Arryn and Baratheon uniting to overthrow the mad king. Robert Baratheon became King and appointed Jon Arryn as the Hand.


The widowed Jon Arryn married Lysa Tully, Catelyn's younger sister. He was significantly older than she. After many miscarriages, Lysa bore Jon a son, (Robin in the HBO series, Robert in the books) who is roughly six years old at the story's beginning. Upon Jon's death (and presumed murder) his son becomes the Lord of The Vale.
Because of Robin's age, his mother Lysa wields all authority as regent. The boy is sickly, weak and uncomfortably close to Lysa, who has refused to wean him. She has also declined to let Robin be fostered anywhere, which is the usual practice for noble youth. With the war, one would have expected that House Arryn would come to the assistance of Houses Tully and Stark, but so far Lysa has refused to call the banners.

The Arryns rule from their mountainous Eyrie, a place that is virtually impregnable to attack. It's hard to get to the Eyrie but it's easy to leave. There is a "Moon Door" which opens to a six hundred foot drop to the mountainside. Lysa and especially Robin seem to have grown fond of "making bad men fly". There has generally been peace in The Vale, with the notable exception of the Mountain Clans, poorly armed groups that rob and kill travelers, but who generally avoid direct conflict with the better armed and organized Knights of the Vale. The Arryn words are "As High as Honor". These words hearken back to their legendary founding as well their mountains, chivalry and religious dedication. 

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Music Reviews-Otis Taylor, Willie King

Otis Taylor
I have written before about some bluesmen who eschew the standard stereotype of a drunk toothless man moaning about how his baby did him wrong. Otis Taylor is one such musician who doesn't fit that frame. He's not from Mississippi. He's from Colorado. In fact, in many ways his music doesn't fit the standard post-Hendrix or post-SRV framework. It's simultaneously modern while at the same time reaching back to very old traditional African-American blues, pre-blues and even African musical influences. Ironically although his music has had some commercial success, often appearing on film soundtracks, it sounds nothing at all like the more commercially successful blues or blues-rock music  with which you may be more familiar.

Although Taylor has written his share of tunes about personal relationships that didn't quite work out, even there his songs generally aren't party tunes or music just to shake your tailfeather to. No his songs on that subject matter are about men and women (or same sex relationships) that couldn't get together because the man was lynched or the woman died of a disease or is a ghost or something far different from most of the lyrics you might think of as blues. In fact even calling him a blues artist is limiting and maybe even insulting. He's like Bob Dylan, Richard Thompson, Stevie Wonder, Led Zeppelin, in that blues may inform much of what he does but he's not limited by blues. He has such an individual sound that he's immediately recognizable. Like Thompson, he's very good at writing dark depressing songs though he's keen to point out that he's a pretty positive guy. His song "Rosa Rosa", dedicated to Rosa Parks is something truly sublime. One of his relatives was lynched and he wrote songs about that. Much of his music is explicitly or implicitly about the violence and harm that humans inflict on each other.

Born in 1948, in his youth Taylor did play in more of a commercially recognizable blues-rock sound and rock style, working with Deep Purple and Cream producers and guitarists before getting disgusted with the music industry and dropping out to do different things, including but not limited to being an antique dealer and bicyclist coach. He returned to music relatively late in life.

Father and Daughter
Other musicians I can compare him to would be people like John Lee Hooker, Ali Farka Toure, Miles Davis or Lightning Hopkins, who didn't necessarily play standard forms of blues, played around with timing and regularly ignored/avoided/rejected chord changes. In much of the earliest music that I've heard from Taylor he wasn't using a drummer. Actually I found I didn't miss it all that much. After all, rhythm is everyone's responsibility. See if you can find his release Reclaiming the Banjo in which he plays and arranges banjo music in a style quite different from the Euro-American bluegrass norms with which the instrument is most closely associated. As Taylor has pointed out in many different interviews, the banjo was originally a West African instrument. He says that his banjo style hearkens back to African roots and not Scottish or Irish ones. But of course he seems to be pretty familiar with Appalachian traditional songs, as you can tell from his version of the murder ballad "Pretty Polly". His music can put you into a trance not just because of the performance style rooted in African-American call and response riffs and vocalisms but because much of his work is drenched in reverb, delay and echo. It's like blues dub. Sound levels change and songs push and pull like a 59' Lincoln with a dying transmission.


Although originally he used another electric guitarist (Eddie Turner)to be his primary soloist, Taylor also calls upon violinists or cellists to perform solos, something extremely rare in modern blues, rock or pop music. And as a multi-instrumentalist, Taylor himself can provide some fascinating solos on harmonica, banjo, electric or acoustic guitar, and mandolin. Lately, he's been using drums. My favorite Otis Taylor song is "My Soul's in Louisiana". Taylor's daughter, Cassie, can often be found playing bass on some of his later releases. If you think you know all there is to know about blues or are just looking for new music you should check out his work. As Taylor has pointed out in interviews, in some respects he's only called a bluesman because he's black. You could just as accurately call him a folk or roots musician. He's still going strong.

My Soul's in Louisiana  Ten Million Slaves (Live with Chuck Campbell) 
 Bowlegged Charlie
Hey Joe(Live) Young Girl Down The Street  Rosa Rosa  Nobody Knows My Name
Resurrection Blues     Black Witch   Little Willie  Mama's Selling Heroin Pretty Polly





Willie King
Willie King was another man, who like Otis Taylor was redefining what blues sounded like. Whereas Taylor was doing this both sonically and lyrically and doing things far beyond the blues framework, King's music was much more sonically recognizable in the traditional blues sense. He was from Mississippi and spent much of his life in Alabama. He was also a former sharecropper and bootlegger. He knew hard times personally.
But lyrically King's music was far more explicit about racism and the struggles of black people than most blues was. This was because King was both a civil rights activist and amateur musicologist as well as a musician. His theory, based on both his own life struggles and talks with older musicians was that much of the older blues music, which talked about struggles between men and women, was actually coded resistance to the white racism of the time. Someone talking about going upside his woman's or her man's head would have been ignored while someone talking about mistreatment by white racists or capitalists would have come to the attention of the authorities, as happened to bluesman J.B. Lenoir, when he wrote politically explicit songs about Eisenhower, Alabama and Vietnam. Generally speaking it's always been much more more prudent for both your career and your income to write songs about women and sex than about politics and race.

But Willie King thought that the time had come to drop what he saw as unnecessary subterfuge and speak directly about the struggles of the black and poor against the rich and the racist. He also did a few relationship songs of course but a bit less than you might think. He named his band The Liberators just so you could not miss the points he was trying to make. To paraphrase that old Fat Albert line you could listen and dance to Willie King's music and if you weren't careful you just might learn something. And, whether the lyrics were political or not almost all of King's music was danceable. So if you're looking for long turgid solos as is common in much modern "blues" you won't find those here. His solos are generally precise and quickly get to the point before King drops back into the all important groove.

In my opinion King's best all around release was Freedom Creek. Virtually all of his best work can be found there. It's a live album which sees King calling upon such influences as Howling Wolf, Jimmy Reed and most obviously James Brown with James Brown's "Payback" modified into "Pickens County Payback" and a second singer on most songs responding to King's guttural gutbucket singing style. The guitar tone is loud but not in a bad way. It's right on the edge of breakup but is nowhere near as distorted as what's found in most rock music. It's got a lot of clarity. He's a preacher, a shaman, a prophet and a prosecuting attorney. Imagine a gruffer Bob Marley. King just didn't sing about fighting power and helping people. He practiced what he preached. He created and helped run a Rural Members Association which was both a social welfare agency and custodian of African American culture. It did such things as provide legal assistance and transportation for needy people as well as running classes in music, quilting, woodworking and plenty of other traditions. He also started the Freedom Creek blues festival. He's passed on but has left an impressive body of work.

Second Coming  Uncle Tom  Stand up and Speak The Truth  Like it Like That Spoonful(Live)
Pickens Country Payback  Terrorized  I am The Blues  Ride Sally Ride (Live)

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Adam Carolla: What's wrong with you Black people

Some (many?) conservatives seem to think that black people are naturally inferior. Now except on the fringes you probably won't find this expressed in the traditional "I hate n*****s. I won't hire them, work with them, live with them or marry them. This is a white (wo)man's country, dammit!!". Although the election of President Obama seems to have brought some of that closer to the surface, it's still I think, somewhat of a minority view, pardon the pun.

But what's not really a minority view is the idea that there's something wrong with black people, that they aren't quite on a par with white people.  We saw a fictional take on this in Django Unchained. Some people couch this in points about culture while others claim that there is real measurable important biological diversity among humans and that black people just happen to have gotten the short end of the stick as far as intelligence is concerned. This is diffused throughout the larger community, really throughout the entire American society. Comedian and commentator Adam Carolla recently gave voice to this view point.
"I want everyone to plan. Look down the road six months," said Carolla. "Yes they foreclosed on your home. That's why you need to have a network, a community, friends, family members, money put away. Don't have the kids."
"Think about it, Adam," challenged Newsom. "Half of African Americans in the state of California, and roughly half of Latino families, have no access to a checking account or an ATM."
And that's when things got hairy.
"What's wrong with them?" asked Carolla. "I want to know why those two groups don't have access. Are they flawed?"
"I want to know why [Blacks and Latinos] are struggling," Carolla continued. "Do Asians have this problem? Why do so many [Blacks and Latinos]? Blacks have been here longer than we have. What about Asians--they were put in internment camps. Are they at the check cashing places?"
"How about the Jews?" asked Carolla. "No problems in the past? Whose had it worse? Why are the Jews doing well? [...] Why do some groups do so much better? I'll tell you why: They have a family who puts an emphasis on education.
LINK

Unwilling immigrant
Carolla's questions fit in neatly with the idea that modern racism is minor or non-existent and that any problems black people have are almost entirely their own fault. It also raises the idea that blacks have less ability to plan for the future, think with their genitals and can't be trusted with money. Unsurprisingly these are the same stereotypes which were used to justify the enslavement and segregation of black people.

Of course to support this idea it's critically important not to discuss the experiences of a wider number of black people. You can't talk about "faulty family structure" when you're discussing situations like black mid level corporate managers who repeatedly find themselves training white co-workers who swiftly surpass them, black youth who are stopped by (and threatened, assaulted or insulted by) the NYPD more than white youth but have fewer guns or drugs found on them, black authors or musicians who can't get cover stories or reviews in white media, black accountants who discover they're paid less than someone white with less education or experience or my personal favorite, black job seekers who discover they have less of a chance of getting a job than someone white with a felony or who learn that their resume was rejected immediately because their name or zip code indicated probable African ancestry. Those things are real and are all going on today. And if anything black parents put more emphasis on education than white parents do simply because they hope that education can protect their children from some of the worst instances of racism in the labor market. This isn't always the case of course.

Although the issues of the so-called underclass , future time orientation, out of wedlock births, conflict resolution, etc are well known and important to solve, they are not the only problems facing the larger black community. I have no problem talking about financial mismanagement or other items which are in an individual's power to change. But there's more to life than that. Carolla seeks to pose as a truthteller when in fact he's just a bully punching down. Where is the oh so brave iconoclast who looks at the past 600 years and asks "What's wrong with white people?". Well chances are he or she won't get mainstream media access, unless it's to make someone else repudiate, denounce and renounce them.

 I'm not part of any "underclass" and I've still seen or experienced real racism, whether it's couched in the coldly polite passive-aggressive corporate style or the direct and dangerous "Why are you in this neighborhood show me your hands" flavor that police tend to prefer. 
As other people have pointed out, if you've been traumatized in some way as a child there's a slightly better than average chance that you're going to have problems as an adult. If you're been assaulted or raped it might be a long time (if ever) before you are as trusting of people as you previously were. If every time you stepped out of the house someone whacked you in the head with a shovel, you might become more fearful than other people of trying or doing new things. If you, deep in your heart of hearts, are convinced that God doesn't look like you but looks like some other group of people, how can you ever get right? 

I've said it before, here and on other forums. And I'm not the only one who's said it. But Black Americans only became legally full citizens post 1965 or so. It's not quite within my lifetime but it's pretty close. For the majority of this country's existence, black people were either slaves or non-people. White people could and did remove or prevent Black people from competing with them. Whether this was done by law (mostly in the South) or custom (more likely in the North) the impact was to retard accumulation of wealth and social resources. And violence or the threat of violence always played a part as well.

So there is no real comparison to be made with other immigrant groups, whether they be Italian, like Carolla's, or Jewish or Asian or any other group. None of them went through what black people in America experienced. None of them had their cultures stolen and mental framework destroyed. Basically what Carolla is saying is that he thinks Black people are inferior. He thinks that other groups could go through what blacks went through and come out better off. Well. I say that that question can't be answered unless we (literally) give black people the whip hand for 400 years and see how whites turn out. Let's make whites worship a Jesus that looks just like Isaac Hayes and see if they have any issues with self-hatred after a few centuries. I think that if this country were majority black and had been for ages, we very might see a Johnny-come-lately descendant of black immigrants making snide comments about what was wrong with the descendants of white slaves, while being totally clueless about his own privileges.

It seems like the new thing is to figuratively tear someone's ACL, slit their Achilles tendon, smash their big toe and then sneer at them for not being to run as fast as you.

Thoughts?

Sunday, March 3, 2013

HBO Game of Thrones: Tully and Greyjoy

As we countdown to Season 3 of HBO's Game of Thrones I thought it might be fun each week to share some quick reminders/background info on which ruling Houses are involved in war, what power they have or had and how they relate to one another. Obviously I intend to do this without spoiler information for Season 3 and hope that any reader who's familiar with the books will honor that as well. Otherwise I'll just have to cut off their heads. Personally. Because the man that passes the sentence should swing the sword. =) Hopefully, if you watch the show once the new season starts and all the names start to fly back and forth, this might help you recall who's who.

House Tully
House Tully rules over the Riverlands from their ancestral seat of Riverrun. The Riverlands used to be ruled from by people from The Iron Isles but that ended a few centuries ago when the cruel King Harren the Black of The Iron Isles thought it was a good idea to fight against the Targaryen invaders and their dragons. After King Harren was roasted to a crispy crisp at his castle, the Targaryens raised the Greyjoys to rule the Iron Isles, and granted overlordship over the Riverlands to the Tullys, who had been prudent enough to support the Targaryens and revolt against the late and unlamented Harren.

The Riverlands are a nice place to visit and live but unfortunately they are not easily defensible. They are centrally located. Besides the aforementioned rivers, there aren't any natural barriers to prevent invasion. Many warring armies have always considered the Riverlands a great place to settle their differences. So House Tully, currently presided over by Lord Hoster Tully, has always been keen to ally itself with other Houses. Lord Tully wed his older daughter Catelyn to Ned Stark and his younger daughter Lysa to Jon Arryn, each heads of their Great Houses. Lord Tully hasn't yet arranged a wedding for his son and heir Edmure, while his younger brother Brynden has steadfastly refused all of Hoster's suggestions, leading to a rift between the two men. 


Brynden, more than anyone else, is the military leader of House Tully. House Tully supported Robert's Rebellion as Catelyn Stark was originally betrothed to Ned's older brother Brandon, who was murdered by the Mad King. Catelyn and Ned's marriage was unusual among arranged pairings in that they actually grew to love each other. Like most Houses in the South the Tullys adhere to the faith of the Seven.

After Catelyn Stark arrested Tyrion Lannister on her father's lands and did so in part in her father's name, Tywin Lannister sent raiding parties to kill, rape and pillage in the Riverlands.  After Ned Stark's death Robb Stark came to his maternal relatives' defense and since then it's been a major slugfest between the Tullys and Starks on one side and the Lannisters on the other. Robb Stark has made a few attacks into the Lannister Westerlands and soundly trashed every Lannister army he's come up against. But he doesn't yet have the strength to evict the Lannisters from his mother's homeland or properly besiege the Lannisters on their home turf. So as usual, it's the so-called smallfolk of the Riverlands who are suffering the most. As House Tully supports House Stark's secession from the Seven Kingdoms, as far as the Iron Throne is concerned they are also rebels who should be hanged, drawn and quartered. The House Tully words are "Family, Duty, Honor", which unsurprisingly is pretty much how Catelyn views her responsibilities and the world in general.





House Greyjoy
You might call this House the (insert class based slur for slow-witted unhygienic rural inhabitants) of Westeros. They rule over a relatively inhospitable area of Westeros, The Iron Isles. They worship The Drowned God (something alien to everyone else in Westeros). Their ways and cultures are quite different. The biggest sticking point between the peoples of the Iron Isles and the mainland is that the folks of the Iron Isles consider violence not only to be normative but also something of a religious requirement. A man who routinely obtains goods or wealth thru trade or business or purchase is considered, at best unmanly and at worse something of a heretic. The proper way of obtaining goods goes something like this. If you want something, you stab its current owner in the neck and take it. This is called paying the Iron Price. It is also why nobody in Westeros who's in their right mind likes or trusts the Greyjoys or anyone from the Iron Isles. It is why Catelyn Stark was so vociferous in telling her son Robb not to let Theon Greyjoy go or trust Balon Greyjoy. If you remember once she heard of the Greyjoy attack on the North she could not prevent herself from telling Robb "I told you so!!".

This House is currently led by the bitterly resentful Balon Greyjoy, who appears to have disinherited his last remaining son, Theon in favor of his daughter (Asha in the books, Yara in the HBO show). Balon also has some equally vile younger brothers. Theon's alarm over his sister's rise in their father's affection is part of what led him to join in on the attack on the North and specifically to try to outdo Yara by taking Winterfell.

The one thing that House Greyjoy is known for, besides being a sniveling bunch of psychotic backstabbers, is that they have perhaps the continent's best fleet and are considered to be Westeros' finest sailors. If Balon Greyjoy had accepted Robb Stark's offer and attacked the Lannister Westerlands or King's Landing, events in Season Two may have proceeded quite differently. But woulda, shoulda, coulda. It is impossible both culturally and psychologically for Balon Greyjoy to accept "gifts" or friendly behavior from other people. As we saw in Season 2 , Theon Greyjoy has good reason to dislike his father, as if it weren't for his father's failed revolt more than a decade earlier Theon would never have been taken as a hostage ward by Ned Stark. The Greyjoys see an opportunity in the War of the Five Kings to be independent of the Iron Throne and stick it to the Starks, whom they hate for suppressing their last rebellion.

Their House words are "We Do Not Sow" which is a reference to their utter disdain for doing any work other than killing people and taking their stuff. They rule from their seat of Pyke.

Saturday, March 2, 2013

Movie Reviews-Flight, Bloody Sunday

Flight
directed by Robert Zemeckis
Flight might have been a great movie. I'm not sure that it was. It was very very good though. It reunites Washington and Cheadle. Though they've put on a little weight and picked up some age lines since Devil in a Blue Dress, they've gained even more in acting gravitas. Each of them have a lot of intensity here. This movie has an ensemble cast where everyone gets a chance to shine, even in very small parts, though obviously Washington's performance is what drives the film. To a certain extent, Cheadle is playing a more relaxed, confident and competent version of his character in Things Behind the Sun

I don't know if you've ever known anyone who's had a substance abuse problem. I have. It's not pleasant. It's even less pleasant if you're unable or unwilling to cut them out of your life. Such people can occasionally be charming and fun individuals who are quite skilled at putting out a line of bovine excretions, even though deep down inside they know they're full of it. And if you're unfortunate enough to have to listen to them, you know they're full of it too, even as they entertain you and maybe even make you laugh from time to time. The problem arises when you or life events make such people confront their own lies. It's one thing to lie to other people, even loved ones. It's something different to lie to yourself.

Whip Whitaker (Denzel Washington) is a high functioning alcoholic and junkie. Alcohol and occasionally cocaine consumption are daily requirements, just like brushing his teeth. He doesn't go an hour without having a drink or a snort of something. Actually it's not necessarily guaranteed that he will brush his teeth in a 24 hour period but it is a certainty that he will have something to drink. I say he's high functioning because of his looks (it's Denzel after all)  and job. He doesn't have bloodshot eyes, missing or grimy teeth and the shakes like some alcoholics I've known. He's not doing anything so prosaic as trying to slowly kill himself or working as a mechanic. He's not like the alcoholics depicted in Trees Lounge or Leaving Las Vegas. No. Whip is a senior airline pilot who, in the opening scene is shown to have a real good thing going on with one of his young attractive stewardesses, Katerina (Nadine Velazquez). Having spent all night drinking, snorting cocaine and playing land the 747 on the landing strip, the dynamic duo is running late for their flight. After an appreciative look at a wholly nude Katerina, Whip takes some more cocaine to get energized and they're off to the races.

Whip's flight crew seems to be somewhat aware of his proclivities. He gets knowing looks from a religious and married stewardess, Margaret Thomason (Tamarie Tunie) who wants Whip to attend church with her and her family some day. Whip's first time co-pilot Ken Evans (Brian Geraghty) balances respect for Whip's experience and skills with an unspoken suspicion of his demeanor and decision making.

In Atlanta a young heroin addicted woman named Nicole (Kelly Reilly), tries to get more drugs for herself and avoid paying her rent. She travels to an adult movie shoot to literally trade some a$$ for cash but decides against it. Nevertheless her (platonic?) male friend offers her some free drugs and warns her not to inject the drugs, just to smoke them. Maybe he felt sorry for her?  Reilly is a British actress. I don't think her attempted southern drawl would convince a southerner she was from the South but you wouldn't necessarily know she was British either.  Whip guides his aircraft through some really rough turbulence before handing off control to Ken and settling in for an alcohol induced nap. But before he can really get his nod going he's awakened. Various controls on the aircraft have broken. The plane is starting to go into an uncontrolled dive. Using every ounce of his skill as a pilot (this is probably the movie's most exciting point) Whip slows the dive, flies upside down, glides after he loses engine power and is able to deliberately crash land the plane outside of downtown Atlanta with minimal loss of life. He's a hero!

Or maybe not. As his ex-Navy buddy and union rep Charlie Anderson (Bruce Greenwood) and the NTSB inform him after he awakens in the hospital, there were six fatalities, including Katerina. The lawyer hired by the union to represent Whip both admires him and seems to have a certain disdain for him. This lawyer, Hugh Lang (Don Cheadle) points out that no one could have done what Whip did in saving so many people. He also lets Whip know that the toxicology report shows that Whip was high as a kite on various legal and illegal substances. Lang intends to get that report legally suppressed but both he and Charlie would greatly appreciate it if Whip would refrain from alcohol and drugs, even attend AA if needed. Lang, lawyer or not, doesn't like liars. He will be quite frustrated with Whip. The NTSB investigates everything anytime there's a plane malfunction, let alone a crash and deaths. There are a lot of jobs and livelihoods that are depending on what the NTSB determines the cause of the crash to be. So Lang, and especially Charlie have an interest in ensuring the NTSB reaches the "right" decision. Charlie is too old to find another job and doesn't want the airline liquidated to pay off settlements and fines.
And that gets into the meat of the movie as there is a struggle between Whip's (non-existent?) better half and the fact that he's an alcoholic junkie. Since he's in the same hospital as Nicole (who's recovering from an overdose) they meet and fall in, well it's not quite love but it's something that's a little more than co-dependence. She's no princess while he's not a knight in shining armor. But they both have tender feelings for each other. However Nicole is further along the path to recovery than Whip is. She wants to stop using. Nicole and Whip each must decide if their relationship is more important than the substance abuse. Whip doesn't think he has a problem and can be cruelly dismissive to anyone who points out the appallingly obvious. Imagine gently telling a significant other or relative with some sort of weight related condition that they probably don't need that third slice of deep dish pizza. Then let's say they respond by snidely pointing out your lack of career success or claim you smell bad.
One thing that I thought was a bit lacking in this movie was that we never learn exactly how Whip's substance abuse problem got started or why it's so fierce. That might have made the character a bit more sympathetic or even understandable. He has a supposedly unpleasant ex-wife (Garcelle Beauvais) and a distant teenage son (Justin Martin) but it's pretty clear that we're seeing things through resentful and alcoholic eyes so these people might not be as bad as Whip thinks. There's a hint that Whip's highly successful father and grandfather were demanding but that's about it. There are times that you might be yelling at the screen for a character not to do something. It doesn't work. But even though I would have liked some sort of origin tale about his alcoholism, Washington is such an imposing and convincing actor that ultimately this doesn't matter. Dude likes to drink. End of story.
I wrote that this was an ensemble cast. And it certainly is. Look for big names like John Goodman as a relentlessly positive and cheerfully dangerous drug dealer, Melissa Leo as a resolute NTSB investigator, as well as other actors like Peter Gerety (who I just remembered is a Homicide:LOTS vet along with Leo) as the profit driven airline company owner, Michael Beasley, James Badge Dale, Ravi Kapoor. You may or may not know all the names but you'll certainly recognize the faces. A woman I know was interested in this movie because there are 1 or 2 scenes in which Denzel Washington (or a stunt bottom) is bottomless. I could have done without seeing that but whatever. So if your life to date somehow just hasn't been complete without seeing Denzel Washington's backside well there you are.

TRAILER




Bloody Sunday
directed by Paul Greengrass
Bloody Sunday is an inarguably great film. You should see it. I really don't have a whole lot more to write than that but I suppose I ought to at least try. Bloody Sunday is an incredibly powerful film that shows in detail the events leading up to and encompassing the doomed civil rights protest march by Northern Irish citizens in Derry, Northern Ireland on January 30th, 1972.

Just as an aside you may be interested after watching this film in understanding more about the struggles in Northern Ireland and the resulting violence. No single version of history is 100% correct, but the bottom line is that Great Britain invaded and colonized Ireland. After a long period of time Ireland became a unified independent nation. But independent Ireland did not include the northern portion, which was disproportionately the home of British loyalists, many of whom were of Scottish and English descent as much as Irish and were often Protestant. They saw no reason to leave their ancestral land or give up political power to the pro-independence partisans, most of whom tended to be Catholic. They were of course Catholic Crown loyalists and Protestant independence supporters, just to complicate matters, as well as relatively apolitical people on both sides who hated the other side because that's just what they had always done. 


By the 1960s and 1970s the British government was taking increasingly repressive measures against Northern Irish Catholics, who were already the oppressed and marginalized group within the land. One tactic that infuriated people was the practice of government (Army) arrest and confinement without trial. Sound familiar? This was called "internment" and was of course primarily aimed at Catholic "terrorist" organizations like the IRA and of course anyone who looked like they supported the IRA. How do you look like you support the IRA? Be Catholic. How did people tell the difference between Catholic and Protestant? Heck I ask myself that about Tutsi and Hutu, Serbs and Croats, Greeks and Turks, and any other number of people that appear superficially similar to an outsider. In America we can sometimes get too caught up in our own struggles around oppression and violence. Things were tough all over.

In 2013 America anyone who wants to seize the moral high ground will oft cynically invoke Martin Luther King or the civil rights movement, whether or not they know anything about MLK.
But in fact MLK and the civil rights movement was extremely influential on people around the world, including one Ivan Cooper (James Nesbitt). Cooper was a Protestant politician who upon seeing MLK's work became committed to non-violence and equality between Protestant and Catholic. He had long been very active in the Irish civil rights movement, though he was disdained as naive by some Catholics and hated as a sellout by some Protestants.


Cooper decides to lead a non-violent march through Derry protesting the internment and other British criminal or army abuses. He is a very optimistic man who is, despite the mutterings of radicals, able to bring together Catholic and Protestant Irish, to sing songs and walk for peace. It's Cooper's hope and goal that he can show the IRA that violence is not the answer and prove to Protestants that they have nothing to fear from equality.
But British Army officers, Brigadier MacIllen (Nicholas Farrell), General Ford (Tom Piggott-Smith) and especially Colonel Wilford (Simon Mann) have different ideas. Marching is illegal and they mean to stop it. They and their men have fought all across the dwindling British Empire and they'll be dammed if they take any cheek from some s****y Irish. Some of their men have died or been wounded in other engagements with Irish "terrorists". Most soldiers have no love for the Irish or "bog-trotters" as they call them.

The film's name is the name given to that day's events. Given the film's name, which also inspired the U2 song of the same title, which is used to somber effect in the ending frames of the movie, you can probably guess what happens. Like any other film in which bullies run amok you may wish you could jump through the screen and shoot back. This film does a masterful job in showing not only the death of innocence but how evil is often rewarded in this world. Much (all?) of the work is done via handheld camera which really gives a "you are there" feeling to the work. I can't overemphasize how real this all feels. Words really fail. We also get to see the random nature of events and how seemingly small decisions can have big impacts on your life. Maybe you didn't even want to go to the march but tagged along because your girlfriend/boyfriend was passionate about it. Maybe you got caught in diverted traffic. Either way, if you were there on that Sunday you were going to pass into history.

TRAILER

Friday, March 1, 2013

Detroit: Governor Snyder says Emergency Manager is needed

In a decision that should surprise absolutely no one Michigan Republican governor Rick Snyder today announced that the City of Detroit would have to have an emergency manager. It doesn't give me any pleasure to see this announcement but it's one of those things that's probably long overdue. Detroit simply can't continue to go on as it is. One thing that really bothers me about all this is that now that a white Republican is calling attention to the dysfunction that is Detroit, Detroiters near and far are coming out of the woodwork to say that an emergency manager is not needed and this is plantation politics and so on. Well maybe. I don't automatically believe that Snyder or anyone he appoints will necessarily have the best interest of the citizens of Detroit at heart. There was a similar state takeover of the Detroit School Board that actually made things worse financially.


 



However there does come a time when you have to put everything else aside and just look at simple math. As much as I might like to purchase The Biltmore, or the Wurzburg Residenz I have neither the income nor capital to arrange such purchases or handle the expenses of such estates. So I have to make do with something a little less extravagant. Similarly Detroit, in which virtually half of property owners refuse to pay their lawful taxes , just can't afford to spend the money or do the things it used to do. Snyder did not cause this. I don't politically agree with Snyder. I don't particularly like Snyder. I did not vote for Snyder. But we must be real. It may make some people feel good to call Snyder everything but a child of God over the next few weeks. But that won't change the math. As the more expansive emergency manager law was recently repealed by Michigan voters, the new emergency manager would not quite have the almost dictatorial powers which would have been available under the old law.

But he or she would still be the person ultimately responsible for financially saving the city of Detroit or, more likely shepherding it through bankruptcy. And I do think that bankruptcy remains the most probable and reasonable outcome. An emergency manager will be able to do some things that mayor and council can't do.

Q: If an EFM is appointed, will Detroit elections for mayor and City Council still go forward?
A: Yes. Detroiters will have a primary election in August and a general in November. What powers those elected officials will have will be up to the EFM.
Q: Who pays the salary of an emergency financial manager?
A: Under state law, the local government pays the EFM. The salary is set by the Emergency Financial Assistance Loan Board, which also approves any necessary expenses that the EFM incurs. But under Public Act 436, which goes into effect March 28, the state, rather than the financially distressed local government, will pay the emergency manager's salary and other costs.
Q: Does an EFM have the authority to change existing labor contracts without negotiation?
A: No. While EFMs are authorized to renegotiate labor contracts, they are not authorized to do away with such contracts or obligations under Public Act 72. Under Public Act 436, an emergency manager may impose new labor terms if negotiations with unions fail and the state approves doing so.
Q: Does an EFM have the authority to eliminate a department or transfer functions of one department to another, or eliminate positions?
A: Yes. Notwithstanding the provisions of any charter to the contrary, an emergency financial manager may consolidate departments of a unit of local government, or transfer functions from one department to another department, and may appoint, supervise, and, at his or her discretion, remove heads of departments other than elected officials, the clerk of the unit of local government, or any ombudsman position in the unit of local government.
But the emergency manager can't MAKE people pay their taxes. Under Michigan law he can't stop pension payments. And he can't tell creditors that he's not going to pay them. Given the virulence of racism in SE Michigan and the hypersensitivity of Detroiters at being dictated to by whites suburbanites/non-Detroiters and the rage of whites suburbanites/non-Detroiters at being forced to pony up money for Detroit (there are truths to both perceptions although each is limited) I still say the smartest move politically would have been for Governor Snyder to stay out of it entirely. If I were him I would have said "I believe that Detroiters can solve their own problems" and shrugged off all questions and most importantly, any requests for state financial assistance. It's unfortunately human nature but by putting an emergency manager in charge that emergency manager will become the focus of Detroiter vitriol instead of bad decisions and bad management by past and current Detroit leaders. Detroit's problems were not all caused by Detroiters. But I strongly believe that letting people stand on their own two feet and make their own decisions is preferable in most cases than trying to do for them. Of course, in dire emergencies this "each man is the captain of his own ship" attitude doesn't work. And Detroit is in such an emergency. We'll see how it goes. I worry that no one really cares if Detroit survives. One group of people will just be angered by what they see as another instance of white paternalism and fight everything on that basis. Another group will be made ecstatic by what they see as another instance of black malfeasance that confirms their racist baseline ideas. And like monkeys in the zoo they will be throwing their s*** at each other. So it goes.

How do you see it? Is this the death of democracy? What would you do as governor?